串かつ

「二度づけはご遠慮願います。」
そんな串かつを初めてたべた。
美味しかった。

そもそも大阪が串かつでちょっと有名ってこと知らなかった。
串かつも日本の文化だよなあ、っておもった。
海外にそんな文化、きっとない。

プレゼン＠近畿

場所を移動する、について熱演。一日二回講演。モニター中継付き。

広報について、改めて考えさせられている今日この頃、また考え方が変わってきた。

一般向け広報も大事だけど、職員６万人向け広報も、そのモチベーションや業務刺激の観点で
すごく大事だと思った。

大阪城と熊本城

加藤清正が運んだといわれる石垣があった。
実際は江戸幕府によるものらしいが。

お堀、そして石造り。似通っているところがあった。

石垣は立派だった。
マチュピチュを思い出した。

Speaking Templates

①
Well, there are MANY choices.
But, if I had to chose JUST ONE, I'd have to say that A is the best.
I have several reasons for this.
For one thing, A is .//////.
And for another thing, A is ////

②
Well, some people may prefer to...../ may think that
But personary I prefer to..... / disagree with the statement.
I have several reasons for this.
First
Second

③
Well, it's an interesting conversation.
The woman/man' s opinion is that it's a bad/good idea to ///////
She has several reasons for this.
For one thing, she thinks that /////
She staetes that
For another thing, she thinks that ///
She mentions that

④
4-1
Well, the main topic of the reading passage and the lecture is /////
The lecurer illustrates //// using 2 example.
The first example is ///
The lecturer states that
The second example is ///

4-2
Well, the main topic of the reading passage and the lecture is /////
The lecurer illustrates //// , showing the experiment.

The lecture mentions about
The lecturer states that
The second example is ///

⑤


⑥
Well, the main topic of the lecture is ////
The professor illustrate it by 2 examples; //// and ////.
The first example is ////
The lecture states that
The second example is ///
The lecture states that

Integrated Writing (Logic)

     The primary position that is taken in the reading passage is that
On the other hand, in the lecture, the professor argues that

      First, the reading passage states that
 However, in the lecture, the professor argues that 
This is in direct contradiction to what is stated in the reading passage.

     It is also mentioned that
     Yet, in the lecture, it is claimed that
, and this is an important point that was not considered by the author of the reading passage.


     In addition, the author of the reading passage states that
In conparison, the professor claims that
This is another example that the author of the passage and the lecturer contradict one another.

     In conclusion, the main points put forth by the professor of the lecuture make the claims of the author of the reading passage more doubtful.